Discussion Bonesmashing Discussion

recessedmutt1.2 said:
it deadass isnt dawg test it by yourself, the only reason ppls dont get results is bcuz they overdo it
Click to expand...
No Way Reaction GIF
 
danielspecialday! said:
do u have anything to back that up? ive heard mixed things about smashing mostly on how its dumb and temporary so idrk but it doesnt make sense ngl
Click to expand...
It's pseudo science. It's primarily theoretical. "Overdoing bonesmashing" is a bit of an oxymoron because for the theory to be applicable at all, you have to create micro fractures in your skull (hence the name), which requires a lot of force.

The "temporary" aspect is because obviously slamming shit into your face to break it slightly is going to cause inflammation, so all they're doing is inducing swelling on the skin. But nobody has ever actually done it properly, and nobody will.

It's mainly a meme thing, or the only people taking it seriously are young kids.
 
danielspecialday! said:
do u have anything to back that up? ive heard mixed things about smashing mostly on how its dumb and temporary so idrk but it doesnt make sense ngl
Click to expand...
dawg why do muay thai fighters and boxers box w o gloves to grow there knuckles ? if it works on the bones of the hand why shouldnt it work on the face?
 
Flint said:
It's pseudo science. It's primarily theoretical. "Overdoing bonesmashing" is a bit of an oxymoron because for the theory to be applicable at all, you have to create micro fractures in your skull (hence the name), which requires a lot of force.

The "temporary" aspect is because obviously slamming shit into your face to break it slightly is going to cause inflammation, so all they're doing is inducing swelling on the skin. But nobody has ever actually done it properly, and nobody will.

It's mainly a meme thing, or the only people taking it seriously are young kids.
Click to expand...
bonesmashing is backed up by mechanotransduction


Physical forces are central players in development and morphogenesis, provide an ever-present backdrop influencing physiological functions, and contribute to a variety of pathologies. Mechanotransduction encompasses the rich variety of ways in which cells and tissues convert cues from their physical environment into biochemical signals. These cues include tensile, compressive and shear stresses, and the stiffness or elastic modulus of the tissues in which cells reside. This article focuses on the proximal events that lead directly from a change in physical state to a change in cell-signaling state. A large body of evidence demonstrates a prominent role for the extracellular matrix, the intracellular cytoskeleton, and the cell matrix adhesions that link these networks in transduction of the mechanical environment. Recent work emphasizes the important role of physical unfolding or conformational changes in proteins induced by mechanical loading, with examples identified both within the focal adhesion complex at the cell-matrix interface and in extracellular matrix proteins themselves. Beyond these adhesion and matrix-based mechanisms, classical and new mechanisms of mechanotransduction reside in stretch-activated ion channels, the coupling of physical forces to interstitial autocrine and paracrine signaling, force-induced activation of extracellular proteins, and physical effects directly transmitted to the cell's nucleus. Rapid progress is leading to detailed delineation of molecular mechanisms by which the physical environment shapes cellular signaling events, opening up avenues for exploring how mechanotransduction pathways are integrated into physiological and pathophysiological cellular and tissue processes.

js took that from pubmed
 
recessedmutt1.2 said:
bonesmashing is backed up by mechanotransduction


Physical forces are central players in development and morphogenesis, provide an ever-present backdrop influencing physiological functions, and contribute to a variety of pathologies. Mechanotransduction encompasses the rich variety of ways in which cells and tissues convert cues from their physical environment into biochemical signals. These cues include tensile, compressive and shear stresses, and the stiffness or elastic modulus of the tissues in which cells reside. This article focuses on the proximal events that lead directly from a change in physical state to a change in cell-signaling state. A large body of evidence demonstrates a prominent role for the extracellular matrix, the intracellular cytoskeleton, and the cell matrix adhesions that link these networks in transduction of the mechanical environment. Recent work emphasizes the important role of physical unfolding or conformational changes in proteins induced by mechanical loading, with examples identified both within the focal adhesion complex at the cell-matrix interface and in extracellular matrix proteins themselves. Beyond these adhesion and matrix-based mechanisms, classical and new mechanisms of mechanotransduction reside in stretch-activated ion channels, the coupling of physical forces to interstitial autocrine and paracrine signaling, force-induced activation of extracellular proteins, and physical effects directly transmitted to the cell's nucleus. Rapid progress is leading to detailed delineation of molecular mechanisms by which the physical environment shapes cellular signaling events, opening up avenues for exploring how mechanotransduction pathways are integrated into physiological and pathophysiological cellular and tissue processes.

js took that from pubmed
Click to expand...
Bonesmashing is theoretical. Most theories are based off of other pre-existing science, but there's zero evidence you can effectively bonesmash at home, and it's never actually been done before (changing your facial bone structure at home by slamming shit into your face).

Most of the looksmaxxers who's "done it" has also walked back on it and every X-ray they've shown does not show any evidence they made any changes to their bones by smashing their faces.

Anyone who's been in the community long enough knows it's mainly a cultural thing and anyone who's serious about Looksmaxxing wouldn't spend their time doing this.

In THEORY bonesmashing MAY work, but in the same way in THEORY you MAY be able to build a space rocket out of your garage, it requires very specific circumstances in perfect conditions consistently for prolonged periods of times to ever even get CLOSE, and this is under the assumption you have the ability to target the area with precision without it causing problems to the rest of the face. Anyone who does actually hit hard enough to cause temporary bone damage also ends up causing permanent damage.

So you can explain the science of why in theory it may work, but you won't ever be able to show evidence it's been actually done at home.

There's no real point on having the debate because you'd get more consistent and better results performing surgery on yourself at home than bonesmashing, and anyone who's in the community or has ever gotten actual results from Looksmaxxing would never actually ever advocate for it.

But you can waste your time and risk your face trying.

recessedmutt1.2 said:
dawg why do muay thai fighters and boxers box w o gloves to grow there knuckles ? if it works on the bones of the hand why shouldnt it work on the face?
Click to expand...
What are you referring to? Arthritis isn't bone growth if that's what you're implying.
 
Flint said:
Bonesmashing is theoretical. Most theories are based off of other pre-existing science, but there's zero evidence you can effectively bonesmash at home, and it's never actually been done before (changing your facial bone structure at home by slamming shit into your face).

Most of the looksmaxxers who's "done it" has also walked back on it and every X-ray they've shown does not show any evidence they made any changes to their bones by smashing their faces.

Anyone who's been in the community long enough knows it's mainly a cultural thing and anyone who's serious about Looksmaxxing wouldn't spend their time doing this.

In THEORY bonesmashing MAY work, but in the same way in THEORY you MAY be able to build a space rocket out of your garage, it requires very specific circumstances in perfect conditions consistently for prolonged periods of times to ever even get CLOSE, and this is under the assumption you have the ability to target the area with precision without it causing problems to the rest of the face. Anyone who does actually hit hard enough to cause temporary bone damage also ends up causing permanent damage.

So you can explain the science of why in theory it may work, but you won't ever be able to show evidence it's been actually done at home.

There's no real point on having the debate because you'd get more consistent and better results performing surgery on yourself at home than bonesmashing, and anyone who's in the community or has ever gotten actual results from Looksmaxxing would never actually ever advocate for it.

But you can waste your time and risk your face trying.


What are you referring to? Arthritis isn't bone growth if that's what you're implying.
Click to expand...
idk how u can quote on quote risk ur face knowing well that if bs is done proprely u dont risk scaring nor bone breaking (IF DONE CORRECTLY) and no g u dont need a perfect force on the long term for acc bone growth, bonesmashing works but i dont know if it creates new bone or basically just harder soft tissue and stuff, dosent really matter beceause both give the result u want
 
recessedmutt1.2 said:
idk how u can quote on quote risk ur face knowing well that if bs is done proprely u dont risk scaring nor bone breaking (IF DONE CORRECTLY) and no g u dont need a perfect force on the long term for acc bone growth, bonesmashing works but i dont know if it creates new bone or basically just harder soft tissue and stuff, dosent really matter beceause both give the result u want
Click to expand...
Permanent swelling is a thing.
 
recessedmutt1.2 said:
idk how u can quote on quote risk ur face knowing well that if bs is done proprely u dont risk scaring nor bone breaking (IF DONE CORRECTLY) and no g u dont need a perfect force on the long term for acc bone growth, bonesmashing works but i dont know if it creates new bone or basically just harder soft tissue and stuff, dosent really matter beceause both give the result u want
Click to expand...
Out of curiosity, what do you think bonesmashing is? You're meant to be creating microfractures in your skull so it "heals" thicker. Wolff's law requires controlled, continuous, and directional weight-bearing stress, which you're not doing with blunt force trauma, which is common sense.
 
Flint said:
It's pseudo science. It's primarily theoretical. "Overdoing bonesmashing" is a bit of an oxymoron because for the theory to be applicable at all, you have to create micro fractures in your skull (hence the name), which requires a lot of force.

The "temporary" aspect is because obviously slamming shit into your face to break it slightly is going to cause inflammation, so all they're doing is inducing swelling on the skin. But nobody has ever actually done it properly, and nobody will.

It's mainly a meme thing, or the only people taking it seriously are young kids.
Click to expand...
That does make alot of sense, especially the part of the inflammation masking the results. it always sounded like swelling than actual bone growth to me, so this really clears it up. I really would rather sticking with proven methods, so its definitely not something id ever try.
 
danielspecialday! said:
That does make alot of sense, especially the part of the inflammation masking the results. it always sounded like swelling than actual bone growth to me, so this really clears it up. I really would rather sticking with proven methods, so its definitely not something id ever try.
Click to expand...
If you're willing to do "dangerous" stuff you're better off doing injections at home or something for like filler. But in general when it comes to your face the best thing to do is to softmaxx as best as you can and then get professional help for everything else.
 
Flint said:
Bonesmashing is theoretical. Most theories are based off of other pre-existing science, but there's zero evidence you can effectively bonesmash at home, and it's never actually been done before (changing your facial bone structure at home by slamming shit into your face).

Most of the looksmaxxers who's "done it" has also walked back on it and every X-ray they've shown does not show any evidence they made any changes to their bones by smashing their faces.

Anyone who's been in the community long enough knows it's mainly a cultural thing and anyone who's serious about Looksmaxxing wouldn't spend their time doing this.

In THEORY bonesmashing MAY work, but in the same way in THEORY you MAY be able to build a space rocket out of your garage, it requires very specific circumstances in perfect conditions consistently for prolonged periods of times to ever even get CLOSE, and this is under the assumption you have the ability to target the area with precision without it causing problems to the rest of the face. Anyone who does actually hit hard enough to cause temporary bone damage also ends up causing permanent damage.

So you can explain the science of why in theory it may work, but you won't ever be able to show evidence it's been actually done at home.

There's no real point on having the debate because you'd get more consistent and better results performing surgery on yourself at home than bonesmashing, and anyone who's in the community or has ever gotten actual results from Looksmaxxing would never actually ever advocate for it.

But you can waste your time and risk your face trying.


What are you referring to? Arthritis isn't bone growth if that's what you're implying.
Click to expand...
im crying i bonesmashed my zygos 30 days straight 😭😭😭and i still bonesmash now im feeling dumb🫩🫩
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top