Bonesmashing Discussion

bonesmashing is backed up by mechanotransduction


Physical forces are central players in development and morphogenesis, provide an ever-present backdrop influencing physiological functions, and contribute to a variety of pathologies. Mechanotransduction encompasses the rich variety of ways in which cells and tissues convert cues from their physical environment into biochemical signals. These cues include tensile, compressive and shear stresses, and the stiffness or elastic modulus of the tissues in which cells reside. This article focuses on the proximal events that lead directly from a change in physical state to a change in cell-signaling state. A large body of evidence demonstrates a prominent role for the extracellular matrix, the intracellular cytoskeleton, and the cell matrix adhesions that link these networks in transduction of the mechanical environment. Recent work emphasizes the important role of physical unfolding or conformational changes in proteins induced by mechanical loading, with examples identified both within the focal adhesion complex at the cell-matrix interface and in extracellular matrix proteins themselves. Beyond these adhesion and matrix-based mechanisms, classical and new mechanisms of mechanotransduction reside in stretch-activated ion channels, the coupling of physical forces to interstitial autocrine and paracrine signaling, force-induced activation of extracellular proteins, and physical effects directly transmitted to the cell's nucleus. Rapid progress is leading to detailed delineation of molecular mechanisms by which the physical environment shapes cellular signaling events, opening up avenues for exploring how mechanotransduction pathways are integrated into physiological and pathophysiological cellular and tissue processes.

js took that from pubmed
Bonesmashing is theoretical. Most theories are based off of other pre-existing science, but there's zero evidence you can effectively bonesmash at home, and it's never actually been done before (changing your facial bone structure at home by slamming shit into your face).

Most of the looksmaxxers who's "done it" has also walked back on it and every X-ray they've shown does not show any evidence they made any changes to their bones by smashing their faces.

Anyone who's been in the community long enough knows it's mainly a cultural thing and anyone who's serious about Looksmaxxing wouldn't spend their time doing this.

In THEORY bonesmashing MAY work, but in the same way in THEORY you MAY be able to build a space rocket out of your garage, it requires very specific circumstances in perfect conditions consistently for prolonged periods of times to ever even get CLOSE, and this is under the assumption you have the ability to target the area with precision without it causing problems to the rest of the face. Anyone who does actually hit hard enough to cause temporary bone damage also ends up causing permanent damage.

So you can explain the science of why in theory it may work, but you won't ever be able to show evidence it's been actually done at home.

There's no real point on having the debate because you'd get more consistent and better results performing surgery on yourself at home than bonesmashing, and anyone who's in the community or has ever gotten actual results from Looksmaxxing would never actually ever advocate for it.

But you can waste your time and risk your face trying.

dawg why do muay thai fighters and boxers box w o gloves to grow there knuckles ? if it works on the bones of the hand why shouldnt it work on the face?
What are you referring to? Arthritis isn't bone growth if that's what you're implying.