How to not sound autistic, no glue no borax

there is a lot there i believe about all that stuff. looksmaxxin terms and such would be the main thing tippin em off that it's not "normal."

i would review typical articles written by mainstream news if you're writing in a more casual tone. okcupid used to publish stuff about data on their site, for an example. one that comes to mind immediately is the attractiveness vs reaction one. they obviously have an incentive, so keep that in mind. but the article explained that if there's a universally "cute" woman, she tends to get less messages. a woman of similar score but had a big difference in who found her attractive would typically get x2 the messages or so.

in reference to currency, im not entirely sure. i know a woman who sees a man is REALLY into her due to a specific or controversial aesthetic, i imagine that's the currency depending on how it's used.

most beauty of women and the comparison of currency is generally objectifying. beauty is set by the observer and changes among culture. currency means there's some type of gain. trust, can be one. people assume beautiful people are more trustworthy. etc